Monday, August 22, 2005

Defending Islamic Terrorism

Talk show host Michael Graham was fired recently from his local station and ABC radio because he made statements on air that an Islamic organization didn’t like. Mr. Graham said in a Web-based column recently, “[o]n July 25th, the Council on American-Islamic Relations demanded that I be ‘punished’ for my on-air statements regarding Islam and its tragic connections to terrorism. Three days later, 630 WMAL and ABC Radio suspended me without pay for comments deemed ‘hate radio’ by CAIR.

“CAIR immediately announced that my punishment was insufficient and demanded I be fired. ABC Radio and 630 WMAL have now complied. I have now been fired for making the specific comments CAIR deemed ‘offensive,’ and for refusing to retract those statements in a management-mandated, on-air apology. ABC Radio further demanded that I agree to perform what they described as ‘additional outreach efforts’ to those people or groups who felt offended.

“I refused. And for that refusal, I have been fired.”

Mr. Graham makes a good point in his own defense, not that one is needed, as you will see when you read the comments that started this episode, which are printed below. “It appears that ABC Radio has caved to an organization that condemns talk radio hosts like me, but has never condemned Hamas, Hezbollah, and one that wouldn't specifically condemn Al Qaeda for three months after 9/11.”

Mr. Graham has called this an assault on free speech. CAIR is indeed trying to squelch this effort at free speech. However, both WMAL and ABC radio have the right to have whomever they choose on the air, or to not have whom they choose on the air. This is not censorship. What it is, though, is cowardly kowtowing; indulging in political correctness; and abandoning the responsibility of news media to present a broad range of information and ideas for Americans to digest and use to form their opinions.

Mr. Graham called it as he saw it. I agree with his analysis, and have said similar things on Observations.

After you read his commentary, you may want to act in his behalf. Here are links to
WMAL radio and ABC radio.

By Michael Graham

I take no pleasure in saying it. It pains me to think it. I could very well lose my job in talk radio over admitting it. But it is the plain truth:

Islam is a terror organization.

For years, I've been trying to give the world's Muslim community the benefit of the doubt, along with the benefit of my typical-American's complete disinterest in their faith. Before 9/11, I knew nothing about Islam except the greeting "asalaam alaikum," taught to me by a Pakistani friend in Chicago.

Immediately after 9/11, I nodded in ignorant agreement as President Bush assured me that "Islam is a religion of peace."

But nearly four years later, nobody can defend that statement. And I mean "nobody."

Certainly not the group of "moderate" Muslim clerics and imams who gathered in London last week to issue a statement on terrorism and their faith. When asked the question "Are suicide bombings always a violation of Islam," they could not answer "Yes. Always." Instead, these "moderate British Muslims" had to answer "It depends."

Precisely what it depends on, news reports did not say. Sadly, given our new knowledge of Islam from the past four years, it probably depends on whether or not you're killing Jews.

That is part of the state of modern Islam.

Another fact about the state of Islam is that a majority of Muslims in countries like Jordan continue to believe that suicide bombings are legitimate. Still another is the poll reported by a left-leaning British paper than only 73 percent of British Muslims would tell police if they knew about a planned terrorist attack.

The other 27 percent? They are a part of modern Islam, too.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations is outraged that I would dare to connect the worldwide epidemic of terrorism with Islam. They put it down to bigotry, asserting that a lifetime of disinterest in Islam has suddenly become blind hatred. They couldn't be more wrong.

Not to be mean to the folks at CAIR, but I don't: Care, that is. I simply don't care about Islam, its theology, its history — I have no interest in it at all. All I care about is not getting blown to smithereens when I board a bus or ride a plane. I care about living in a world where terrorism and murder/suicide bombings are rejected by all.

And the reason Islam has itself become a terrorist organization is that it cannot address its own role in this violence. It cannot cast out the murderers from its members. I know it can't, because "moderate" Muslim imams keep telling me they can't. "We have no control over these radical young men," one London imam moaned to the local papers.

Can't kick 'em out of your faith? Can't excommunicate them? Apparently Islam does not allow it.

Islam cannot say that terrorism is forbidden to Muslims. I know this because when the world's Muslim nations gathered after 9/11 to state their position on terrorism, they couldn't even agree on what it was. How could they, when the world's largest terror sponsors at the time were Iran and Saudi Arabia — both governed by Islamic law.

If the Boy Scouts of America had 1,000 scout troops, and 10 of them practiced suicide bombings, then the BSA would be considered a terrorist organization. If the BSA refused to kick out those 10 troops, that would make the case even stronger. If people defending terror repeatedly turned to the Boy Scout handbook and found language that justified and defended murder — and the scoutmasters in charge simply said "Could be" — the Boy Scouts would have driven out of America long ago.

Today, Islam has entire sects and grand mosques that preach terror. Its theology is used as a source of inspiration by terrorist murderers. Millions of Islam's members give these killers support and comfort.

The question isn't how dare I call Islam a terrorist organization, but rather why more people do not.

As I've said many times, I have great sympathy for those Muslims of good will who want their faith to be a true "religion of peace." I believe that terrorism and murder do violate the sensibilities and inherent decency of the vast majority of the world's Muslims. I believe they want peace.

Sadly, the organization and fundamental theology of Islam as it is constituted today allows for hatreds most Muslims do not share to thrive, and for criminals they oppose to operate in the name of their faith.

Many Muslims, I believe, know this to be true and some are acting on it. Not the members of CAIR, unfortunately: As Middle East analyst and expert Daniel Pipes has reported, "two of CAIR's associates (Ghassan Elashi, Randall Royer) have been convicted on terrorism-related charges, one (Bassem Khafegi) convicted on fraud charges, two (Rabih Haddad, Bassem Khafegi) have been deported, and one (Siraj Wahhaj) remains at large."

But Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf admits what CAIR will not. He's called for a jihad against the jihadists. He's putting his life on the line (Islamists have tried to assassinate him three times) in the battle to reclaim Islam and its fundamental decency.

He remembers, I'm sure, that at a time when Western, Christian civilization was on the verge of collapse, the Muslim world was a bastion of rationalism and tolerance. That was a great moment in the history of Islam, a moment that helped save the West.

Let's hope Islam can now find the strength to save itself.

Source: Jewish World Review


Anonymous said...

"Islam is a terrorist organization"

That's a pretty disgusting statement. It's pretty hard for the US to convince Muslims we are not at war with their religion when you got kooks like this saying just that. If he had distinguished- "fundamental islam", or talk about those Wahhabist schools, etc- then he'd have a leg to stand on.

I hope he stays fired.

James Shott said...

I have some sympathy for his opinion, simply because "moderate Muslims" have failed so miserably to fight the radical fringe. Having failed, it appears as if Islam tends to support terrorism. I think that is the point he was making.

In any event, CAIR has little credibility in this argument because of its failure to condemn terrorism.

Anonymous said...

On the contrary, moderate muslims have repeatedly condemned terrorism. Many US organizations did so after 9/11, similarly in London after the train bombings, and many places elsewhere. It is sad that it took these extreme circumstances to goad them, but then again, pre-9/11 the average American did not actively condemn terrorism- we left that to our politicians.

When was the last time you condemned abortion clinic bombings publicly? Using your logic, I could suggest you are part of a terrorist organization.


James Shott said...

Moderate Muslims have condemned terrorism, but in a whisper. The major organs of Islam have not done so, at least not in a strong voice.

As the editor and publisher of a newspaper, I did indeed publicly condemn abortion clinic bombings.

However, the comparison between abortion clinic bombings and Islamic terrorism is a thin one. Islamic terrorists have hijacked an entire religion. They kill in the name of their God. They use Allah to justify the indiscriminate (and often deliberate) killing of innocent men, women and children. If you were a Muslim, you simpley wouldn't stand for that, unless you agreed with that philosophy, or unless you weren't a staunch Muslim.

So it is an open question whether Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance, or a religion of murder and brutality. Right now, it appears to be the latter. Only when the loudest voice from Islam is a voice denouncing terrorism, and the leaders of Islam take firm steps to stop the murdering can anyone seriously believe otherwise.

Anonymous said...

Actually, the differences you list between Muslim terrorists and Christian anti-abortion crusaders seem more like similarities to me (religious labels aside of course).

Glad to hear you did speak out. Of course there are a number of priests and preachers in this country who don't, and don't speak out about putting Dr.'s names and addresses on the web, etc.
So I guess Christianity is a terrorist organization, at least in the US

James Shott said...

There is a vast difference in degree, at the very least. It a far easier sell to label Islam a terrorist organization, based upon the last few years' activity, than to label modern Christianity a terrorist organization, although I get your implication.

Anonymous said...

Imam Robertson, at it again.

Good to see many preachers and the like distancing and condemning his incitement

James Shott said...

Obviously, he has the same right to free speech as people like Michael Moore, Dick Durbin, Howard Dean, Ted Kennedy, Cindy Sheehan, so he can say whatever he wants. What he said is no worse, looked at objectively, than much of what that previous list has said.

However, as not only a Christian, but a man of the cloth, he ought not to campaign for the assassination of anyone.

I'm disappointed that he made that remark. He should know better.

Anonymous said...

I won't debate you.
All I can say is if Pat Robertson is a man of God, what a sh***y God

Anonymous said...

Unknown said...

"simply because "moderate Muslims" have failed so miserably to fight the radical fringe..."

I totally agree... I just do not see there being the kind of dialogue most of have. That is, it is totally amazing (and totally sad) as to what human beings can rationalize left to their own devices.

As a general rule, and from an ethnocentric point of view (of course), I would say Western, Christian-based systems of government are a helluva lot more moderate... strictly because most arguments gets tempered by the time they make it to policy.

Most, that is! Not all!

mocha-frappuccno said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.